RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, VOL. 19, ES6003, doi:10.2205/2019ES000695, 2019
| Mainshock | $b$-value | Model parameters |
| Chili, 2010, M8.8 | $b=1.36$ | ETAS: $\mu=0.65$, $c=0.08$, $p=1.26$, $K_0=0.028$, $\alpha=1.82$ |
| EP: $\Delta M=1.5$, $\mu_{EP}=0.1$, $\Lambda=0.2$, $c=0.034$, $p=1.01$ | ||
| Tohoku, 2011, M9.1 | $b=1.06$ | ETAS: $\mu=0.81$, $c=0.17$, $p=1.56$, $K_0=0.04$, $\alpha=1.74$ |
| EP: $\Delta M=1.5$, $\mu_{EP}=0.2$, $\Lambda=1$, $c=0.04$, $p=1.02$ | ||
| Sumatra, 2012, M8.6 | $b=1.26$ | ETAS: $\mu=0.43$, $c=0.1$, $p=1.52$, $K_0=0.01$, $\alpha=1.846$ |
| EP: $\Delta M=1.5$, $\mu_{EP}=0.1$, $\Lambda=0.7$, $c=0.05$, $p=1.36$ |
Citation: Baranov S. V., A. D. Gvishiani, C. Narteau, P. N. Shebalin (2019), Epidemic type aftershock sequence exponential productivity, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 19, ES6003, doi:10.2205/2019ES000695.
Copyright 2019 by the Geophysical Center RAS.